Home / News / Industry News / Back Pressure and the Foundation of Melt Quality in Injection Molding

Back Pressure and the Foundation of Melt Quality in Injection Molding

1. Defining Back Pressure (BP)

In the field of injection molding, Back Pressure (BP) refers to the adjustable hydraulic resistance applied to the rear of the reciprocating screw during the plasticizing (or metering) phase of the cycle.

Unlike Injection Pressure which pushes the melt forward into the mold cavity, Back Pressure is a counter-pressure that resists the screw's rearward movement as the plastic melt accumulates in front of the screw tip. It is a critical parameter that ensures the quality and consistency of the molten polymerbeforethe injection begins.

2. The Core Functions of Back Pressure

Back Pressure serves three primary, fundamental roles in preparing the polymer melt:

2.1. Homogenization and Mixing 

Increasing the pressure against which the screw rotates increases the friction and resistance experienced by the melt. This extends the time and force applied to the material, significantly improving melt homogeneity and dispersion.

  • Color Dispersion: Higher BP is essential when mixing masterbatches or colorants, ensuring they are uniformly distributed, preventing color streaking or blotching in the final part.

  • Temperature Uniformity: The increased shear and mixing help to eliminate localized hot spots and ensure the melt temperature (T_m) is uniform throughout the volume, which is vital for consistent shrinkage and viscosity.

2.2. Air and Volatile Gas Removal

During the metering phase, plastic pellets and powder often trap air, moisture, and volatile components.

  • Compaction: Back Pressure compresses the molten plastic. This compression forces trapped air and volatile gases back toward the feed section of the barrel, allowing them to escape through the hopper or vents.

  • Defect Prevention: Without adequate BP, these gases remain in the melt and are injected into the mold cavity, leading to defects such as silver streaks (splay marks) or internal voids (bubbles) in the finished product.

2.3. Shot-to-Shot Consistency (Metering Accuracy) 

BP plays a decisive role in achieving a repeatable and accurate shot volume (metering).

  • Melt Density Control: By compacting the melt, BP ensures that the material has a consistent density at the end of the plasticizing stroke. A consistent density means a consistent mass of polymer is injected per shot, regardless of slight variations in screw position or material bulk density.

  • Weight Control: Stable melt density directly translates to consistent part weight and dimensional stability across different cycles.


3. High vs. Low BP: Process Consequences

Setting Back Pressure requires careful balance. Its impact on the process and final part quality is immediate and dramatic.

Back Pressure Setting Primary Consequences Resulting Defects / Issues
Too High (PBP​↑) Excessive Shear Heat and Residence Time Material Degradation (burnt spots, discoloration), Increased Cycle Time (due to slower screw retraction), Increased Screw Wear.
Too Low (PBP​↓) Inadequate Compaction and Mixing Silver Streaks / Voids (trapped air/moisture), Inconsistent Part Weight (poor metering), Poor Color Dispersion.

Part 2: Packing/Holding Pressure and Dimensional Control

4. The Role of Packing/Holding Pressure (PH)

While Back Pressure controls the quality of the meltbeforeinjection, Packing/Holding Pressure governs the integrity and stability of the partafterthe mold cavity has been filled.

This pressure phase begins immediately after the primary Injection Pressure has filled the mold to approximately 95% - 98% volume. The control system switches from a speed-controlled filling stage to a pressure-controlled packing stage.

The fundamental objective of PH is to compensate for material shrinkage. As the molten plastic inside the mold cavity cools and transitions from a liquid to a solid state, its volume naturally decreases (volumetric shrinkage). PH maintains a sustained forward pressure on the screw to push additional material into the cavity, effectively "refilling" the space created by this cooling contraction.


5. Critical Impact on Quality: Shrinkage and Stress

The settings for PH and Hold Time are the primary levers for controlling the final dimensions, weight, and surface aesthetics of the molded part.

5.1. Compensation for Sink Marks and Voids

The most immediate effect of PH is preventing surface depressions and internal defects:

  • Sink Marks: These defects occur when the outer skin of the part solidifies while the inner, thicker core continues to cool and shrink, pulling the skin inward. Increasing PH forces more material into the cooling zone, effectively mitigating this volume reduction and eliminating sink marks.

  • Voids: If the outer skin is too rigid to be pulled in, the shrinkage of the core creates a vacuum, forming internal voids. Sufficient PH prevents this by keeping the cavity full.

5.2. Controlling Dimensional Stability and Warpage

Warpage, or distortion, is largely caused by differential shrinkage—where different areas of the part shrink at different rates due to varying thickness or cooling rates.

  • High PH Risk: While necessary, excessive PH can create high levels of molded-in stress (residual stress), particularly near the gate. This stress, combined with uneven cooling, can be released after ejection, manifesting as warpage or distortion.

  • Optimizing PH: The optimal holding pressure is the minimum value required to eliminate sink marks and achieve the target part weight, thus reducing residual stress and minimizing warpage.


6. The Interplay with Hold Time and Gate Freeze

The effectiveness of PH is entirely dependent on the Hold Time and the mechanical event known as Gate Freeze.

Concept Definition Process Implication
Gate Freeze Time The precise moment the material in the narrow gate area solidifies, permanently sealing the cavity from the runner system. Once the gate is frozen, PH​ becomes ineffective because no more material can enter the cavity.
Hold Time The duration for which the set Holding Pressure is actively applied by the machine. The set Hold Time must be equal to or slightly longer than the Gate Freeze Time to ensure proper packing and to account for minor process variations.

If the Hold Time is prematurely terminated (i.e., less than the Gate Freeze Time), the gate is still open when the pressure is released. The packed material inside the cavity can then flow back out (suck-back), immediately causing severe shrinkage defects.

In summary, PH is applied to define the final material density and dimensional accuracy of the part, while Back Pressure is applied earlier to define the consistency and quality of the melt being delivered.

Part 3: Comparative Analysis and Process Optimization Strategy

7. Back Pressure vs. Holding Pressure: A Direct Comparison

Understanding the functional segregation between Back Pressure and Holding Pressure is crucial for effective process troubleshooting and control. They operate at opposing points in the cycle and address different categories of defects:

Feature Back Pressure (PBP​) Packing/Holding Pressure (PH​)
Time of Application Plasticizing / Metering Phase (Screw retracting) Post-Filling Phase (Screw slowly advancing)
Primary Goal Melt Quality: Ensure melt uniformity, density, and remove air/volatiles. Part Quality: Compensate for material shrinkage and define final dimensions.
Defects Addressed Silver Streaks (Splay), Voids, Color Streaks, Inconsistent Shot Weight. Sink Marks, Warpage (Residual Stress), Short Shots, Dimensional Variation.
Optimized For Consistency and Homogeneity Density and Dimensional Accuracy

8. Strategy for Process Optimization

A systematic approach to setting these pressure parameters is vital for achieving a robust (consistent and repeatable) injection molding process.

8.1. Setting Back Pressure (BP)

The ideal BP is the minimum pressure required to achieve consistent melt quality and density without introducing excessive heat or cycle time.

  1. Start Low: Begin with a low hydraulic setting (e.g., 50 bar).

  2. Inspect Melt: Check the melt for defects like air bubbles or poor color mixing.

  3. Increase Incrementally: Gradually increase the BP until all signs of air (silver streaks) or poor mixing are eliminated and the shot weight becomes consistent.

  4. Monitor: Ensure the screw recovery time remains acceptable and the melt temperature does not exceed the material's thermal degradation point due to shear heat.

8.2. Setting Packing/Holding Pressure (PH)

The optimal PH is the minimum pressure necessary to compensate for shrinkage without flashing the mold or introducing excessive stress.

  1. Determine Gate Freeze Time: Conduct a Hold Time Study by weighing parts molded with increasing hold times until the part weight plateaus (indicating the gate is sealed). This determines the minimum Hold Time required.

  2. Determine Minimum PH: Use a high initial hold time (to ensure gate seal) and gradually reduce PH until sink marks or short shots reappear. The set pressure should be slightly higher than this minimum.

  3. Check for Flash: Verify that the chosen PH does not cause flash (material seeping out of the mold parting line), as this indicates the clamping force is being overcome or the pressure is too high.

  4. Optimize Warpage: If warpage is present, PH may be too high, locking in differential stress. Consider lowering PH (as long as sinks are acceptable) and extending the cooling time to relieve stress more slowly while the part is still contained in the mold.


Conclusion

Both Back Pressure and Holding Pressure are indispensable tools, each controlling a distinct aspect of the injection molding process. Back Pressure guarantees a high-quality polymer feedstock, acting as a preparatory step. Holding Pressure then ensures that this high-quality melt is effectively packed into the cavity to counteract thermal shrinkage, defining the final dimensional and aesthetic properties of the component. Mastering the sequential and iterative adjustment of these two parameters is the hallmark of a scientifically robust and efficient molding operation.

Recent Posts

CONSULT NOW